|
The
architectural ensemble of Cathedral Square which was being
formed in the 15th-16th centuries is
closed on the north side by the building of the
Patriarch’s Palace. Today, it houses the Museum of
Applied Art and Life-Style of 17th-century
Russia.
From
the first decades of the 14th century, The
Metropolitan’s residence was already on this site. The
earliest brick building was erected here back in 1450:
“Metropolitan Jonah laid the foundations of a stone
chamber in his courtyard”, says the chronicle. Over
several centuries that have passed since then, the
metropolitan’s residence with all its structures was
damaged by fire many times and then rebuilt.
An
important stage in the history of the Patriarch’s Palace
is associated with the name of the all-powerful
Patriarch’s Nikon (1605-1681). In 1653, he started the
grandiose rebuilding of his residence. He summoned the
best architects, painters, goldsmiths and stone-carvers to
do the job. In two years the palace of the High Priest was
not inferior to the tsar’s residence as regards its
size, architectural aspect and exuberant decoration. This
was consistent with the Patriarch’s political credo
declaring the superiority of “Priesthood over Tsardom”.
The
palace and the domestic church of the Twelve Apostles
adjoining it make an integral architectural set. The
church stands on high through arcades. The facade is
decorated on all sides by two rows of small arches. The
white-stone decoration of the walls of the Patriarch’s
Palace is in perfect harmony with the décor of the other
architectural monuments in Cathedral Square.
The
Palace’s numerous halls are connected by vestibules and
passages. In keeping with tradition, the ground floor was
used for household needs and services; gala halls
(chambers) and the domestic church were on the first
floor, and the patriarch’s living apartments on the
second.
In
1721, the palace became the seat of the Moscow Holy Synod.
The
palace was repeatedly rebuilt in the 18th-19th
centuries and the medieval decoration of its interior has
not been preserved. The museum, which has been opened
here, is based on the Moscow Kremlin collection. It
contains objects, which characterize the 17th-century
life-style of the top layers of Russian society (both
secular and religious).
The
exhibition in the Small Vestibule (Inner Porch) shows how
the metropolitan’s, and later the patriarch’s,
residence appeared in the territory of the Kremlin.
In
the Gala Vestibule, religious and every-day articles which
used to belong to the heads of the Russian church in the
17th century are on display: Patriarch
Nikon’s sakkos, domestic caftan and Klobuk (headgear);
Patriarch Philaret’s bratina (loving-cup), the bratina
and the plate belonging to Patriarch Joseph, a silver
walking stick adorned with precious stones, etc.
These
precious possessions reflect the tendency of the time the
attributes of ecclesiastical and secular power vying with
each other come closer with regard to the splendor and
sumptuousness of their decoration.
The
main gala hall of the Patriarch’s Palace was the
Krestovy (cross) Chamber. Functionally, it played the same
role as the Facets Palace in the Great Kremlin Palace. In
this hall the patriarch received the tsar and ambassadors
of foreign states; here church councils (Sobors) were held
and special banquets too. In 1763, after a stove for
making chrism was built here and a wood-carved canopy roof
erected over it, the hall was then called the Chrism
Chamber.
The
huge hall, 230 square meters in area, has no supporting
pillars and is remarkable for its new architectural design
and the beauty of the interior decoration. The floor of
the chamber was first laid with colorful tiles and the
windowpanes were of multicolored mica. Contemporaries
said, “The hall strikes the imagination, there is no
equal to it in the whole tsar’s palace”.
Today,
this unique specimen of civil and religious architecture
of the mid-17th century houses a museum of
applied art and life-style of 17th-century
Russia. This occupies the first floor of the building.
This
hall contains articles of everyday use which were designed
for various purposes: Old Russian household utensils,
articles made by silversmiths and goldsmiths from both
East and West, jeweler, a collection of table clocks and
pocket watches, some items of the tsar’s gala horse
tackle and hunting gear, etc.
The
exhibits shown here are interesting as the typical
examples of works of art and everyday articles of the 17th
century. Hence one can acquire a better knowledge of
Russia’s material and spiritual culture and its customs
and traditions.
The
two other rooms of the palace which have retained their
old architectural forms give an idea of the décor of rich
living apartments of the 17th century. These
are rather small rooms with low vaulted ceilings and
narrow windows; the windowpanes are of colored mica. Their
decoration was usually bright and multicolored: the walls
were upholstered in colorful cloth, foreign fabrics, or
leather stamped with gold, the floor was upholstered in
colorful felt. Multicolor glazed tiles covered the stoves.
Icons were given an important place in the interior
decoration. They were usually placed in the “front”,
or “red”, corner. Examples of traditional furniture
are the broad benches covered with colorful cloth, and the
big chests in which kitchenware and other household
utensils were kept.
With
the changes in the traditional “patriarchal” way of
life in the second half of the 17th century,
the interior of rich houses also altered. As one of the
contemporaries aptly said, there “the old and the new
met and mixed”. In a single room, alongside traditional
Russian furniture, one could find a Dutch dresser and a
German cupboard; portraits of Tsar Alexia Mikhailovich and
courtier P.I.Potemkin could be seen on the walls next to
icons. A study could have a collection of manuscripts and
printed books of the 17th century (among them
the hand-written ABC book by Karion Istomin, and the book
entitled “A Medicine for the Soul”, and the printed
Grammer Book and the Gospel), as well as some pieces of
furniture.
The
interior of rich people’s living apartments has been
recreated on the basis of documentary evidence; genuine
articles have been used.
The
refectory of the Patriarch’s Palace houses a collection
of Old Russian decorative and pictorial embroidery. Works
of this original art produced by Russian seamstresses and
gold embroideresses had different uses; among them were
covers for church vessels, the palls for tombs of saints,
and pelenas (altar-cloths) for the icons. All of these
used to decorate church interiors at one time. Pearl
embroidery and precious stones were very popular. A
remarkable piece of fine embroidery work is the pelena
“The Virgin of Vladimir” from the vestry of the
Cathedral of the Assumption. Made by seamstresses of the
Tsarina’s Kremlin Workshops, it looks more like an icon
in a gold frame studded with pearls and precious stones
than a piece of embroidery.
One
of the most interesting sections of the said exposition is
housed in the Cathedral of the Twelve Apostles. This
domestic church of the Russian patriarchs forms part of
the architectural complex of the Patriarch’s Palace. The
interior of the church has undergone many changes over the
past centuries: the windows were widened and the
iconostasis repainted. The present-day restores succeeded
to a great extent to recreate the 17th- century
interior.
The
old iconostasis has been lost. The present sumptuous five
tier iconostasis made of carved and gilded wood used to
belong to a cathedral of the Kremlin’s Ascension convent
(now demolished) and it was transferred to the Cathedral
of the Twelve Apostles in 1929. The iconostasis has been
fully restored. It is executed in the late 17th-century
Moscow baroque style and is remarkable for the variety of
ornamental motifs and expressiveness. The rich
ornamentation includes flowers, fruits and berries. But
the favorite motifs are a twining vine, acanthus leaves
and a scroll.
Today
the church contains a unique collection of 17th-century
icons most of which adorned the Kremlin cathedrals. The
exhibition is arranged in chronological order which makes
it possible to follow one of the most interesting trends
in the development of Russian icon-painting in the first
half of the 17th century- the so-called
“Stroganov” school, and also to get an idea of the
work of the court icon-painters in the second half of the
17th century. The Stroganov school icons
“elevated the soul” and “pleased the eye”; they
were painted for art connoisseurs and possessed special
aesthetic qualities. The name of the “Stroganov
School” is associated with the patronage of art on the
part of the “eminent Stroganov family” who had their
own icon-painters’ workshops in the town of
Solvychegodsk in the Urals. The period between 1660s to
the end of the 17th century saw a departure
from the traditional style of Russian icon painting. In
such work as “Theodore Stratilatus”, “St. Andrew”.
“The Crucifixion” and other icons by the well-known
painters of that time such as Simon Ushakov, Fyodor Zubov
and Fyodor Rozhnov, some features of new art, later known
as “realistic” art, become noticeable, moreover, an
apparent interest in life, nature and man makes itself
strongly felt.
The exposition of the Museum of Applied Art and
life-Style of 17th-century Russia gives an idea
of the aesthetic concepts and artistic tastes of Russian
society in the 17th century allowing one to
feel and understand the uniqueness of the country’s
spiritual life at the turning point of its history-the
transition from medieval to modern history.
.
|