|
The cathedral of the
Assumption (Dormition) holds a special place in Russian
history and culture. One of the church figures of the past
century described it as "the image of the world
church and the earnest of Russia's state integrity".
The cathedral had for many centuries served as Russia's
state and ritual center where grand princes were
proclaimed and appendage princes swore allegiance to them,
Czars were enthroned and, later, emperors were crowned. It
was here that bishops, metropolitans and patriarchs were
inaugurated, governmental acts were read out and grand
services were held before the beginning of military
campaigns and after their victorious completion. The
cathedral is the resting place of the heads of the Russian
church of the 14th-17th century period, among them the
relics of thaumaturgies Peter, Jonas, Philip and Hermogen.
The lofty destination of the cathedral accounted for the
special attention accorded to it over centuries, with the
best architects, artists and jewelers doing their utmost
to adorn it and the rulers donating numerous objects of
worship. In the beginning of this century when the world
discovered for itself the phenomenon of Russian medieval
painting, the world's best collection of 12th-17th century
icons was found in the Cathedral of the Assumption. The
world's knowledge of Russian art would have been much
poorer but for the relics of the Cathedral of the
Assumption.
The
erection and reconstructions of the cathedral took place
at crucial periods in Russian history. It was founded in
the early 14th century when the Moscow princes had just
started bringing all Russian lands together, and Ivan
Kalita was contending for grand princedom writ. In 1326,
Metropolitan Peter whose seat was in the city of Vladimir,
and prince Ivan Kalita laid, at the top of the Kremlin
Hill, the cornerstone of the cathedral consecrated, like
the main cathedral in Vladimir, to the Assumption of the
holy Virgin. Moscow emerged on the political scene as the
successor of Vladimir. In December 1326, Metropolitan
Peter passed away and was buried in the cathedral whose
construction had not been completed yet. His successor,
Metropolitan The Ognost moved his residence to Moscow,
which further strengthened the positions of the Moscow
princes in their contention for grand princedom and the
unification of Russian lands.
Experts
have long attempted to reconstruct the initial aspect of
the cathedral of the Assumption, and other structures
erected in the time of Ivan Kalita, none of which has
survived. The material evidence on which they base their
conclusions is confined to the 15th century icon
"Metropolitan Peter. “Vita icon" in which the
cathedral is shown, and the remains of the foundations
discovered by archaeologists. It was a single-dome church
of modest size with tall chapels adjoining the main
section on three sides. The walls were decorated with
modest bands of carved white stone. It is likely that
initially there stood the Chapel of 1329; the Chapel of
the Adoration of the Apostle Peter's chains was built on
the northern side of the chancel. The chapel was
consecrated to Metropolitan Peter and later became known
as the Chapel of the Apostles Peter and Paul. In 1459,
after the miraculous salvation of Moscow threatened with
an invasion by Khan Sedi Akhmet of the Golden Horde, the
Chapel of the Praise of the Holy Virgin was erected.
Thus
surrounded by structures on all sides, the ageing building
survived until the year 1472 when the ruler of All Russia,
Grand prince Ivan the Third decided to build for himself a
residence adequate to his high position. The new Kremlin
was to symbolize the grandeur of the Russian state, which
had united practically all Russian principalities and was
now the center of Orthodoxy after the downfall of
Byzantium. He began with the erection of the Cathedral of
the Assumption, which was to reproduce the size and
appearance of the majestic Cathedral of the Assumption in
Vladimir built in the 12th century, the golden age of the
Vladimir-Suzdal land. Yet the construction work started in
1427 by architects Krivtsov and Myshkin eventuated in a
disaster in 1474 when the already vaulted huge building
collapsed. To resume work, Ivan the Third invited
Aristotle Fioravanti, a prominent Bologna engineer and
architect. In a matter of five summer seasons he cleared
the debris and built the cathedral, which we see today.
Contemporaries attached special significance to that
undertaking and a detailed story about the erection of the
Cathedral of the Assumption was written into chronicles.
The chroniclers closely followed the progress by
Fioravanti, such as demolition of walls with fire and
water, the use of extra durable bricks in combination with
white stone, utilization of metal joints, and the drafting
of the layout according to the compasses and the ruler.
The new cathedral was ceremoniously consecrated on August
12, 1479. The building impressed contemporaries as
something "majestic, lofty, radiant and
spacious". Although Fioravanti copied the prototype,
a cruciform five-domed church, rated accurately, he
produced an entirely new structure from the architectural
viewpoint. The building, which perfectly suited its
ceremonial purpose, had a tremendous impact on 16th
century Russian architecture.
The
cathedral built of moderate-size white stone blocks has
facades articulated by massive pylons of the same width
and height. The altar apses, far-projecting semicircles as
a rule, are flattened and concealed behind the pylons.
Fioravanti preserved the earlier chapels, placing them in
the lateral sections of the channel. The walls are
practically devoid of decor. The narrow slit like windows,
the receding portals and the carved architecture, belt
submerged into the depth of the wall and supported by
engage columns, while setting off the solidity of the
walls, accentuate the monumental sternness of the
cathedral. Five closely set powerful domes terminate the
building. Contemporaries appreciated the monolithic
quality of the structure, nothing that it gave the
impression of a single stone. The geometrically lucid
composition, the distinct proportions, monumentality and
significance distinguish the cathedral from the
surrounding buildings. Certainly the Cathedral of the
Assumption is the architectural center of the smart
Cathedral Square. The interior is still more distinctive.
The metal joints and one-brick-thick vaults allowed
Fioravanti to increase the dimensions of all internal
articulations to the maximum. All the vaults are of the
same height, while the round pillars, rather than
crowding, create the impression of a vast auditorium. The
chronicler noted this as he compared the cathedral with a
gala palace chamber.
Over
centuries the cathedral did not change its aspect
appreciably notwithstanding numerous repairs and
restorations. In the beginning of the 17th century the
vaults were rebuilt and the shapes of the roofs and domes
were somewhat changed. At the end of the past century
major restoration operations were carried out,
reconstructing the initial shape of the windows, removing
layers of plaster from the walls and exposing the white
stone masonry. The original facing was largely replaced.
Shortly
after the completion of the construction work they began
decorating the cathedral. In 1481, Dionysus, the best
painter of the period, painted, together with his team, a
three-row iconostasis and several large icons. Shrouds and
palls embroidered with pearls and gems appeared along with
ritual attributes of precious metals. In 1513-1515, the
cathedral was decorated with frescoes. Nothing the fact,
the chronicler wrote that “when entering the church and
seeing this glorious creation, the cathedral church with
its wonderful wall paintings and shrines of great
thaumaturgies, one has the sensation of being in
Heaven”, thus comparing the church with paradise. Not
much of the original décor has remained. New ones
replaced indeed dilapidated icons; fire or enemy raids,
old-time frescoes were scarped off in the mid-17th
century, destroyed much. It was only in the beginning of
this century that restorers discovered several old
compositions in the channels. In 1914,Ye.I.Bryagin
uncovered a fresco in the vestry hidden under numerous
layers of stucco and whitewash. It was “The Adoration of
the Magi” which the experts easily identified with
Dionysus. Prior to the alterations undertaken in the 17th
century the fresco adorned the praising Chapel. The
composition is harmoniously fitted into the arch whose
shape is repeated by the cut lines of the blue glory and
the recumbent figures of the angels, the shepherds and the
magi bringing gifts. The outlines of the gracefully
elongated figures with small heads and finely delineated
visages, and the radiant color gamut based on the
combination of golden ocher with blue, violet, pink, and
blue shades remind one of the frescoes of Ferapontov
Monastery which were doubtlessly painted by Dionysus.
“The Praise of the Holy Virgin” painted on the vault
of the chapel by other artists is distinguished by bigger
forms, thick contrasting storks and succulent colors.
Two
old-time frescoes- “Forty Martyrs of Sebastian” and
“Seven Sleeping Youths of Ephesus”- have survived in
the Chapel of the Apostles Peter and Paul, and another
fresco, “Three Youths in a Fiery Furnace”, has
remained on the wall of the altar. Another fragment, small
yet very important for the study of early painting, has
been discovered recently behind the canopy over the
sepulcher of Metropolitan Peter. It is a fraction of their
composition “Forty Martyrs of Sebastian”, obscured and
partly scarped off while building the canopy. While other
surviving paintings have come down to us considerably
damaged, this fragment is wonderfully well preserved.
Back in
the 19th century, people knew about the
existence of frescoes on the stone altar partition behind
the iconostasis, yet it was only recently that it became
possible to uncover and restore it and carry out thorough
investigation. The northern part of the altar partition is
now exposed to view. The frescoes embellishing it have
never been renovated and therefore preserve all the
distinctive features of the painter’s artistic manner.
Such
frescoes on stone altar screens are typical of many 14th-16th
century monuments. Perhaps, initially they made up a kind
of additional row of the iconostasis but gradually became
obscures by the icons of the lower row. They present
half-size figures of monks-monastery founders, authors of
monastery charters, and hermits. Conceived as part of the
iconostasis, they are artistically close to the icons with
their close painting manner, thorough elaboration of
details and emphatically expressive visages. Superb
artistic quality distinguishes the figures in the northern
part, which were undoubtedly painted by the head of the
team. All researches investigating the cathedral ascribe
them to Dionysus. Although the frescoes have been studied
for over a hundred years, there is no agreement among the
researchers about the year of their production, with the
dating varying from 1479 to 1515.
Apart
from these fragments, which are few in number, the very
system of painting dates back to the 16th
century. It is known that before repainting the cathedral
in the 17th century, the early frescoes were
“transferred” and most of the compositions were
repeated. Wall paintings in an Orthodox church mirror its
symbolism, while bringing out and elucidating the main
dogmas, and are closely related with the service. The
motifs indispensably present in the church paintings of
the Cathedral of the Assumption are noted for their
clear-cut, well-thought-out and lucid compositions, On the
vaults of its five domes various images of God are
depicted –“The Pantocrator”, “The Vernicle”,
“The Lord of Sabaoth”, “Savior Emmanuel” and
“Holy Virgin of the Sign”. The upper part of the
cathedral is taken up by illustrations of the Gospel-
church feasts on the vaults, and parables and miracles in
two upper rows on the walls. Their arrangement corresponds
to the sequence of services held during the year. The next
two rows present the life of the Holy Virgin and
illustrations to the solemn singing in her honor, the
great chants, associated with the consecration of the
church. The chanting cycle first appeared in Russian
monumental painting somewhere the 15th and 16th
centuries when Russia began to consider itself as the
successor of Constantinople, as “The Land of the Holy
Virgin”. The ideological trends of the time are also
reflected in the frescoes of the lower row. Presented here
are huge pictures showing the seven Ecumenical Councils in
the 4th-7th centuries, which
formulated the main Christian dogmas and fought heresy.
Over a
hundred figures of martyrs and warriors, among them the
Russian princes Vladimir, Boris and Gleb, are painted on
the pillars, which support the church vaults just as the
saints supported Christian faith with their life and
martyrdom. The western wall is taken up by “The Last
Judgment” a huge composition. In general, the frescoes
of the Cathedral of the Assumption are among the brightest
illustrations of the political and ideological views of
the nascent Russian autocracy.
The
main part of the frescoes in the Cathedral of the
Assumption dates back to the 17th century. The
first czar of the new dynasty, Mikhail Fyodorovich Romanov,
commenced wide-scale reconstruction and beautification of
the Kremlin. Under a special edict issued in 1642, about a
hundred and fifty artists were brought to Moscow from
different towns to decorate the cathedral. The czar’s
icon painters Ivan and Boris Paisein and Sidor Pospeyev
headed the team. An immense volume of work was handled
within two short summer seasons. It is exactly those
paintings that have reached us, although with considerable
losses. Among the factors behind their poor preservations,
were inadequate temperature and moisture conditions,
leaking roofs, soot and, as a result, numerous
refurbishing. The frescoes were cleaned and washed for
each coronation ceremony. Twice, in 1771-1773 and 1856,
they were fully repainted in oil. Early in this century
the over paint was removed but the original painting was
again renovated and the background was gilt. Restoration
work was continued in 1960-1985. The over paint was mostly
removed yet the remaining repetitions, gilt of later
periods and numerous refurbishing of damaged spots prevent
comprehensive appreciation of the 17th century
painting manner. It is only in the chancel where frescoes
were first discovered in 1985 and preserved in their
original shape that individual compositions give one an
idea of the brightness decorative value, succulence of
pure colors and thorough modeling of 1642-1643 paintings.
The
restoration work started in 1910 assumed particular scope
in the first ten years following the revolution,
discovering under the metal settings and later over paint
a rich collection of early icons. Thus, 12th-17th
century icons of all trends and schools known in Russia,
as well as works by Byzantine and Balkan artists were
found.
In
1344, Greek artists and their Russian pupils decorated the
first cathedral building with frescoes and probably they
painted some surviving icons. Among these it the
breast-size image of Christ pantocrator which already in
antiquity became known as “The Saviour of the Firce
Eye” an epithet conveying the idea of the stern and
formidable image. Considerable dimensions and the visage
create the impression with pronounced wrinkles on the
forehead, hollow cheeks and penetrative eyes. The tension
is heightened by the contrasting combination of dark green
and almost white colors in the depiction of the face and
the bright red coloration of the mouth.
It is
likely that “The Trinity” icon of the middle of the 14th
century was in the first cathedral building. The icon
illustrates the Old Testament story about the appearance
of three angels to patriarch Abraham. Arranged in a
semi-circle, they preside over repast. Below are smaller
figures of minor characters- Abraham carrying fruit on a
platter his wife Sarah kneading the dough and his servant
slaughtering the calf. But the purport of the icon is not
confined to illustrating the scriptural story of the
patriarch’s hospitality. It symbolizes one of the most
worshipped Christian feasts. The angels personify triune
God, the calf being slaughtered signifies Christ’s
sacrifice, while the grapes in Abraham’s hands and the
bread in Sarah’s hands accentuate the Eucharistic
quality of the composition. The fourteenth century
painting was uncovered but partly on the figures of the
angel on the right-hand side and Sarah. In continuing the
cleaning the restorers discovered on the upper over paint
layer the signature of Tikhon Filatiev, one of the
czar’s leading painters who renovated the icon in 1700.
While preserving the old iconography, he produced an
entirely new work of art in which the influence of West
European painting- direct perspective, three- dimensional
chiaroscuro modeling of figures and well-developed still
life is well in evidence.
In
1395, troops led by powerful Tamerlane were approaching
Moscow. In preparing for the defense, the Muscovites
brought the miraculous icon “The Holy Virgin of
Vladimir” from the city of Vladimir by Prince Andréa
Bogolyubsky in the mid-12th century and became
the city’s main relic and protector against enemy raids.
Shortly after the ceremonial meeting of the icon in
Moscow, Tamer lane’s troops unexpectedly retreated,
which was associated with the intercession of the
miracle-working image. From that time “The Holy Virgin
of Vladimir” was considered as the main relic and
protector of Moscow Russ. At present the miraculous icon
is preserved at the State Tretyakov Art Gallery, while the
Cathedral of the Assumption keeps two replicas of the size
of the old icon. They were painted shortly after the
renovation of the original. While reproducing its main
features, they nevertheless mirror a different ideology
and different stages in the development of early Russian
painting. The earlier, so-called reserve, replica was
produced in the first third of the 15th century
by a contemporary of Andréa Rublev. The figures of the
Holy Virgin and the child are delineated with a gently
rounded line; the visages are modeled with mild strokes of
liquid translucent paint and have no tragic quality of the
Byzantine Prototype. Metropolitan Varlaam made the other
replica in 1514. The artist replicated not only the
painting, but also the gold setting of the first half of
the 15th century with the depiction of church feasts with
the figures of Fathers of the church and Russian bishops
between the feast scenes. This is a typical early 16th
century portrayal with overly elegant elongated
proportions of figures and exquisite radiant color.
Three
icons painted by non-Russian artists. - "The Queen
did stand", "Glorification of the Holy
Virgin" and "The Apostles Peter and
Paul"-date back to the period between the 14th and
15th centuries. At that time many Greek and Balkan
artists, having escaped from the Turkish invaders, were
working in Russia. "The Queen did stand" and
"Glorification of the Holy Virgin" illustrate
liturgics chanting. "The Queen did Stand" are
the opening words of psalm 45, a version of the Diesis
prayer. The vestments of enthroned Christ combine imperial
and bishopric attributes, while the Holy Virgin wears the
formal attire of a Byzantine empress. A Balkan, probably
Serbian artist painted the icon in the last quarter of the
14th century. The combination of bright succulent colors
with abundant gilt accentuates the solemnity of the image.
It was
only in 1991 restores completely uncovered the icon
"The Apostles Peter and Paul" painted by a Greek
artist who worked in Russia in the early 15th century. The
icon suffered much from numerous renovations, the original
golden ground was lost, while repeated patching spoiled
the shape of the legs. Fortunately, later repairs
practically did not affect the majestic figures of the
supreme apostles.
Evidently,
"The Assumption of the Holy Virgin" was painted
for the consecration of the cathedral in 1479. The icon is
intricate compositionally and has a narrative quality.
Rising over the couch on which rests the body of the Holy
Virgin, is the figure of Christ with Maria's soul in the
shape of a swaddled baby. Besides the apostles paying
homage to the diseased, there are holy fathers,
"Wives of Jerusalem" and the host of angels.
Over that scene is St. Mary's ascension to the open gates
of Paradise, with angels carrying the apostles on clouds.
The abundance of characters and strictly symmetrical
composition underscore the significance of the scene. The
expressiveness of the characters and subdued colors with
the inclusion of vibrant shades make the icon akin it
mid-15th century productions.
The
icon "Metropolitan Peter. A vita icon" produced
in Dionysus' workshop at the turn of the 15th century
represent different manner. The first Moscow metropolitan,
one of the most revered Russian saints, is shown during
service, clad in holiday vestments decorated with pearls
and precious stones. He blesses the flock with the right
hand, while holding the Gospel in a precious setting in
the left. His figure, elongated and ethereal, seems to
soar in the air against a light background. Border scenes
illustrating the main events in the saint’s life, among
them the construction of the Cathedral of the Assumption
surround the central composition. The icon is painted in
light translucent colors creating the impression of ease
and festivity.
Another
fine artist of the late 15th century painted "The
Apocalypse” on the subject of "Revelations of St.
John the Divine", one of the most tragic books of the
New Testament, which tells about the vision of the end of
the world and the Last Judgment shown to the Apostle John
by God. The appearance of the radiant and formidable deity
is alternated in the book with the depictions of the
penalties imposed on our sinful earth. The icon
illustrates the text very comprehensively, yet the artist
does not observe the sequence of events, thus creating his
own picture of the world. In the upper row the scenes
taking place in Heaven, the second row shows the suffering
and peril of people on earth and the lower row presents
episodes of the Second Advent- the peril of the sinners
and the triumph of the righteous. The theme of the
Apocalypse was popular in Russia at the end the 15th
century. According to the old chronology, the year 1492
was the year 7000 and so the end of the world was
expected. However, the icon "The Apocalypse" in
the Cathedral of the Assumption with its well-balanced
composition, elegant figures, graceful postures and
gestures of its numerous characters and radiant palette
with the predominance of red and white colors, does not
express horror in expectation of the end of the world but
rather hopes for the salvation of the righteous Orthodox
Russian state, as if the artist had been inspired by the
words of Filofey, one of the authors of the "Moscow
the Third Rome" theory according to which "all
Christian countries are flooded with disbelief, and only
the kingdom of our sovereign alone is standing by Christ's
mercy".
In
1547, the Kremlin suffered from a devastating fire, which
destroyed practically all its buildings. Young Ivan the
Terrible who had just been crowned as Russia's czar began
restoration work, which continued until the mid-60s. The
authors of the ambitious Kremlin beautification, plans
were Metropolitan Makary. Sylvester, the archpriest of the
cathedral of Annunciation, the czar's confessor, and the
czar himself. New frescoes decorating the churches and
palace buildings and also numerous icons were intended to
glorify Russia and its autocratic ruler. In a rather
intricate manner, using scriptural motifs and allegories,
they told about the baptism of Russia and the inheritance
of the glory of ancient Rome and Orthodox Byzantium by the
Russian rulers, while glorifying the deeds of Ivan the
Terrible. The Cathedral of the Assumption was also on the
programmed, although the fire had spared it. In 1551, a
praying platform was made for Ivan the Terrible to the
right of the metropolitan's stone platform, close to the
grand southern door. It is most likely that Novgorodian
masters did this unique piece of work. Diverse decorative
motifs are represented and diverse wood carving techniques
once widespread in Russia are employed here. At the base
are four round sculptures of fanciful beasts which carry a
structure square in plan with intricately shaped columns,
rail posts and valances, terminated with a whimsical tent
carrying numerous kokoshniks, rosettes and vases. In
literature this contraption is often referred to as
Monomach's throne having in mind the texts inscribed on
the doors and the twelve low-relief’s on the walls
illustrating "The Tale of the Princes of
Vladimir", the story of how the Monomach crown, and
other regalia were brought to Russia. "The Tale"
appeared at the turn of the 15th century, authored by
Russian ideologists who sought to substantiate the
legitimacy of the Moscow princes' authority.
The unification of Russian
lands under Moscow was accompanied by the unification of
the cults of local saints, resulting in the emergence of
the centralized Russian Church. Simultaneously the number
of icons in the cathedral considerably increased. They
were now placed in icon-cases standing along the walls and
round the pillars. The property of the cathedral is listed
in the earliest of the surviving inventories made in the
early 17th century. Many large icons of local saints were
painted specially for the cathedral. Among the surviving
ones are the hagiographic icons of Alexander Svirsky and
the thaumaturgies St. Zosima and St. Savvaty of Solovetsky
Monastery. Their appearance followed the canonization’s
that took place in 1547 and 1549. The numerous border
scenes acquainted the viewer with their life and miracles.
The icon "The Holy Virgin of Bogolyubovo with the
lives of St. Zosima and St. Savvaty" was painted to
the order placed by Metropolitan Philip Kolychev, once
Father Superior of Solovetsky Monastery who had done a lot
for the monastery’s prosperity. Shown in the center are
the Holy Virgin and the devotional group of monks headed
by the saints, the founders of the cloister. The artist
noted the insular position of the monastery and reproduced
its structures with a fair degree of accuracy.
.
|